What about a child living at a home where smoke is constantly in the air smoke lingers even when there doesn't appear to be any making 2nd hand smoke still a factor. They find this offensive because they believe that, since smoking is not a crime, the government nor anyone else should not have a say about what they do and limit their freedom. There are plenty of things that cause cancer. Actually it's pretty close to caffeine - and that we all enjoy. Stifling any one religion can result in violent protests by both, followers of the offended religion and others as well. Tobacco become a global threat.
Smoking by pregnant females is harmful to the baby, and inhaling second hand smoke has now been shown to damage health as well as disgust non-smokers. I do not agree with children inhaling second hand smoke, but neither do I agree with world hunger and poverty. It is a personal choice and a highly addictive habit, and it is not for the government or any third party to dictate whether or not a person should be allowed to smoke. Welcome to CreateDebate CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy. Second Another reason for banning smoking is that cigarette smoke affects the health of non-smokers. These statistics show how largely smokers. But where's their scientific proof? In 1991 commonwealth legislation also made new rules on tobacco in Australia.
Now tell me how I missed my own debate topic. People who do not smoke tobacco die of the same diseases as smokers. He served during the Cold War and has traveled to many countries around the world. Also, smoking and second hand smoke hurts society and individuals alike. Also smoking also leads to alcohol use. Argument number two, As for the health concerns, most of them apply only to cigarettes. There was a time when opium based drugs were legal.
After all they kill people. Some of the chemicals you are less likely to know about are the heavy metals, humectants, casting agents, pesticides and insecticides added into a cigarette. . No, I am not denying your claims about the statistics of tobacco smokers, I am indicating to you that those statistics are irrelevant, off point, to the question of the debate. I have tried to quit or quit at least a dozen times.
Cant innocent people just not live in the hood? Ethics is a system of moral principles governing the appropriate conduct…. Eventually, the production and consumption of smoking create businesses and jobs for people, and high cigarettes taxes finance early child education and public safety; however cigarette smoking should not be available because they are killing people. Smoking cigarettes should be banned for the well-being of the smokers… Should Cigarette Smoking Be Banned Think about the number of times you have passed an outside public area and the awful smell of cigarette some is filling the air. Children will continue to take it up if they see that it is being done openly by adults and their peers. Also, the nicotine inside is very addictive. A lit cigarette is burning at 1100 degrees F. So on balance I'd say that a core principle of the scientific method is valid here: look at all of the research, not just some of it, and especially not just the bit you like.
There are many other issues of your argument that are less than logical, allow us to consider the above before we address the others. Let us know what you think about these topics. People who decide to take up smoking know full well what they're going to be doing to themselves. What you are suggesting is not greater education about the dangers of smoking or a government program to help smokers quit if they wish, but simply a complete ban on the product. The man utterly confused says no my wife does! On that note, cigarette price is being increased now and then. Moreover, smoking causes air pollution and litters the environment as well. Advertisements have ranged from showing how fun smoking can be to showing how deadly it is.
They see the hypocrisy of society saying it's so bad for you but at the same time allowing smokers to openly smoke in front of them and force non-smokers to breath the second hand smoke. People with emphysema often get bronchitis again and again, and suffer lung and heart failure. Some religions use tobacco as part of their rituals and ceremonies, such Native Americans. Smoking is only harmful in excessive amounts. Banning acohol started gangs, and caused an underground industry to arise, and the government got no share. Taxes in other areas would go soaring up which i would love to see since it might teach alot of the anti smoking a brigade a harsh truth that smokers, though it may not seem, help them by keeping their taxes etc low Also i would not want to even imagine what an uprising would happen through out the country the amount of smokers going against the gov etc imagine the prisons it would be chaotic. Health considerations are the number one reason why it should be banned, but banning smoking could also help businesses financially.
Drug related crimes would take a nose dive sure. The first and foremost argument for the implementation and regulation of a smoking ban is very obviously, health related. So I say that cigarettes should be illegal. Barriers to passing such a ban include the power of big tobacco companies, the cost of enforcing such a law, and the rise of a black market for cigarettes, experts say. In addition, there are a lot of public places where smoking is not banned.